Jaani Dushman Kurdish File
The Kurds do not have the luxury of forgetting who their enemies are. Every generation must learn the list: the Turkish general, the Ba'athist torturer, the ISIS executioner, the Iranian prosecutor, the Western diplomat who smiles and then signs a weapons deal with Ankara.
When the KDP invited the Turkish army into Iraqi Kurdistan in the 1990s to fight the PKK, or when the PUK aligned with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), many ordinary Kurds felt the Jaani Dushman was not an external state, but the failure of their own leadership. The corruption, the smuggling of oil, and the inability to unite for independence referendums (e.g., the 2017 Iraqi Kurdistan independence referendum, which failed due to lack of international support and internal incoherence) have led some intellectuals to argue that is the true sworn enemy. Chapter 4: The Modern Geopolitical Chessboard – Friends That Become Enemies The Kurds have historically been used as proxies. The United States, Israel, and European powers have armed Kurdish forces (the Peshmerga and YPG/SDF) to fight common foes: Saddam Hussein, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS. Yet, time and again, these powers have abandoned the Kurds when it suits their national interest. Jaani Dushman Kurdish
After the 1991 Gulf War, the US established a no-fly zone to protect Iraqi Kurds. They considered Washington a friend. However, in 1975, the US had abandoned the Kurds to Saddam after the Algiers Agreement with Iran. More recently, in October 2019, President Trump’s pullout from northern Syria allowed Turkey to invade the Kurdish-held region of Rojava, effectively betraying the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) who had done the ground fighting against ISIS. For many Syrian Kurds, the USA is now a Jaani Dushman —a fair-weather friend who becomes an enemy the moment the battle ends. The Kurds do not have the luxury of
However, this promise was shattered by the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, which divided Kurdish-majority lands among the newly formed Republic of Turkey, British-mandate Iraq, French-mandate Syria, and Persia (Iran). This event—known in Kurdish historiography as the Great Betrayal —planted the seeds. The signatories of Lausanne, particularly the emerging nation-states of Turkey and the Arab-mandates, became the primary candidates for the role of Jaani Dushman . The corruption, the smuggling of oil, and the
But who—or what—qualifies as the "Jaani Dushman" in the Kurdish consciousness? Is it a specific neighboring state? A particular ideology (like Pan-Arabism or Pan-Turkism)? Or is it a network of external powers who have historically used the Kurds as pawns and discarded them as liabilities?
